首页> 外文OA文献 >Accurate detection of changes in disease activity in primary sjögren's syndrome by the european league against rheumatism sjögren's syndrome disease activity index
【2h】

Accurate detection of changes in disease activity in primary sjögren's syndrome by the european league against rheumatism sjögren's syndrome disease activity index

机译:欧洲联盟针对风湿病舍格伦氏综合症疾病活动指数准确检测原发性舍格伦综合症疾病活动的变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To assess and compare the sensitivity to change of the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) with that of other primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) disease activity indexes. Methods. We abstracted 96 patient profiles, including data on 3 successive visits (visits 1-3), from the medical charts of patients with primary SS. Patient profiles were scored with the ESSDAI, SS Disease Activity Index (SSDAI), and Sjögren's Systemic Clinical Activity Index (SCAI). Thirty-nine experts assessed 5 profiles for whether disease activity had improved, worsened, or remained stable at visits 2 and 3. Results. For improved patients, the standardized response means (SRMs) for all scores did not differ, and ranged from -1.08 to -1.38 between visits 1 and 2 and from -0.50 to -0.76 between visits 2 and 3. For patients with worsened activity, the SRMs between visits 1 and 2 and between visits 2 and 3 were +0.46 and +1.10 for the ESSDAI, -0.03 and +0.79 for the SSDAI, and +0.17 and +1.02 for the SCAI, respectively. For patients with stable activity, the SRMs between visits 1 and 2 and between visits 2 and 3 were 0.00 and -0.13 for the ESSDAI, -0.44 and -0.11 for the SSDAI, and -0.36 and +0.34 for the SCAI, respectively. Conclusion. For patients with improved activity, the 3 disease activity indexes showed similar, large sensitivity to change. However, the ESSDAI seemed to detect changes in activity more accurately than other disease activity indexes. Notably, for patients with stable activity, the ESSDAI did not show erroneous improvement. © 2010, American College of Rheumatology.
机译:目的。为了评估和比较欧洲抗风湿病联盟干燥综合征综合症活动指数(ESSDAI)与其他主要干燥综合征综合症(SS)疾病活动指数对变化的敏感性。方法。我们从原发性SS患者的病历中提取了96位患者资料,包括3次连续就诊的数据(第1-3次访问)。用ESSDAI,SS疾病活动指数(SSDAI)和Sjögren的全身临床活动指数(SCAI)对患者资料进行评分。 39位专家评估了5位患者在第2次和第3次访视时疾病活动是否有所改善,恶化或保持稳定。对于病情改善的患者,所有评分的标准缓解均值(SRM)均没有差异,在第1次和第2次就诊之间介于-1.08至-1.38之间,在第2次和第3次就诊之间介于-0.50至-0.76之间。访问1和2之间以及访问2和3之间的SRM对于ESSDAI分别为+0.46和+1.10,对于SSDAI分别为-0.03和+0.79,对于SCAI分别为+0.17和+1.02。对于活动稳定的患者,ESSDAI的访视1和2之间以及访视2和3之间的SRM分别为0.00和-0.13,对于SSDAI为-0.44和-0.11,对于SCAI为-0.36和+0.34。结论。对于具有改善的活动的患者,这三个疾病活动指数显示出相似的变化敏感性。但是,ESSDAI似乎比其他疾病活动指数更准确地检测活动变化。值得注意的是,对于活动稳定的患者,ESSDAI并未显示出错误的改善。 ©2010,美国风湿病学院。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号